Right to respond before publication — handling of my hearing recording (CIO/IT)

Dear Mr. Fell,

I intend to publish on October 9th, 2025 a document-first account of
how TTUHSC handled my December 11, 2023 dismissal-hearing recording.
Based on my firsthand recollection from the review session you
oversaw/attended, I will state that specific statements I recall from
the hearing were not present in the version I was allowed to access.

To be precise: I am not asserting a technical "gap" in the audio file
at a known timestamp today; rather, I will describe my memory that
certain content was missing from the playback I was provided and that
I am seeking the native recording and audit history to verify
integrity.

So I can include your perspective, please respond by 48 hours to the following:

1. Did you oversee or attend my review session(s)?
2. Who had custody/control of the hearing recording between the
hearing date and my review session (names, departments)?
3. Was the file transcoded, excerpted, redacted, or otherwise altered
for my session? If so, by whom, when, and why?
4. Where is the native/original recording stored (system location),
and what hash/checksum or audit logs exist for it?

Any statement you provide will be published verbatim in a "Responses"
appendix linked from my post. If you decline to respond, I will note
that.

Sincerely,

Kevin Bass PhD MS
Phone: [REDACTED – HOME-PHONE]