Chapter 3: Due Process¶

In the American legal tradition, "due process" is a fundamental right. It means that before the government (or a public university) can take something away from you—like your education or your reputation—you must have a fair chance to tell your side of the story.

After discovering the discrepancies in his file (Chapter 1) and being denied a copy of the evidence (Chapter 2), Kevin Bass formally requested a new hearing.

The Request¶

On October 19, 2025, Kevin Bass sent a formal request to university officials. He asked for: 1. A new hearing to challenge the accuracy of his student record. 2. A neutral decision-maker (someone not involved in the original dismissal). 3. The right to present evidence that contradicts the official findings.

The Response: Silence¶

The university was given a deadline to respond. That deadline passed.

Kevin Bass sent follow-up emails. He asked for confirmation of receipt. He asked for a scheduling contact. He asked for accommodations.

As of December 2025, the university has not granted a hearing. The request remains in administrative limbo.

"A hearing is not a favor. It is the basic mechanism of justice."

The Core Dispute¶

What Everyone Agrees Happened¶

• Kevin Bass submitted a hearing request on October 19, 2025.
• He sent multiple follow-up messages to verify the request was received.
• The university has not scheduled a hearing.

What Is Disputed¶

• Obligation: Kevin Bass contends the university is legally required to grant this hearing to correct the record.
• Procedure: The university's silence suggests they may believe the original proceeding was sufficient, despite the alleged errors.

Key Evidence¶

Next: Chapter 4 - The Squeeze