Executive Summary¶
This summary is maintained by Kevin Bass, Ph.D. For the author's background and credentials, see the Press Kit.
Purpose & Approach
This hub exists because I was harmed and am seeking resolution through lawful, evidence-based channels. My goals are: (1) correcting the record where it contradicts primary evidence, (2) ensuring due process is followed, and (3) contributing to institutional accountability so this is less likely to happen to others. I welcome scrutiny and correction—see the Corrections page to report errors.
"The integrity of the record is the foundation of due process."
The Core Issue¶
This case concerns the dismissal of Kevin Bass—a Ph.D. biomedical scientist and former MD/PhD student—from Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) and the subsequent discovery of irregularities in the official administrative record.
Evidence collected suggests that the institutional record does not accurately reflect the events that transpired, raising serious questions about due process, administrative accountability, and compliance with public records laws.
Key Findings¶
1. The Hearing Discrepancies¶
Sworn testimony and available evidence contradict the official account of the dismissal hearing. - The Allegation: The committee relied on specific statements and events to justify dismissal. - The Evidence: Contemporaneous notes and subsequent preservation requests suggest these events were characterized inaccurately or omitted context critical to the defense. - Key Document: Right to Respond — Hearing Recording Integrity (DOC-20251007-004)
2. Missing or Withheld Records¶
Despite immediate preservation notices, key administrative records appear to be missing, incomplete, or withheld. - Preservation Notice: On October 6, 2025, a comprehensive legal notice was served to preserve all relevant data. - The Outcome: Responses to TPIA (Texas Public Information Act) requests have been delayed or incomplete, necessitating escalation to the Texas Attorney General. - Key Document: Immediate Preservation Notice (DOC-20251006-001)
3. Procedural Irregularities¶
The timeline reveals a pattern of deviation from standard operating procedures regarding student rights and disciplinary processes.
The Evidence at a Glance¶
| Category | Finding | Key Exhibits |
|---|---|---|
| Due Process | The student was denied access to the full hearing record required for a meaningful appeal. | Transcript Requests |
| Transparency | Requests for metadata and communication logs have met with resistance. | TPIA Metadata Request |
| Accountability | Escalation to the Attorney General was required to enforce basic transparency. | AG Referral |
Why This Matters¶
This case concerns the integrity of the administrative record. When an institution's official record contradicts primary evidence, and when transparency regarding proceedings is resisted, it undermines the reliability of the dismissal process and the institution's public accountability.
What TTUHSC Has Said¶
TTUHSC has not publicly released a detailed narrative of its decision-making. The institution's position, as reflected in available correspondence, is that standard procedures were followed. This hub invites TTUHSC to correct any factual errors via the Corrections page.
For Legal Counsel
- Exhibit index: Documents
- Chronology: Visual Timeline
- Records process: TPIA & Records
- Corrections/errata: Corrections
- Download for filing: Use browser print or the "Download as PDF" button in the footer
Next Steps¶
- Review the Record vs. Reality comparison to see specific contradictions.
- Explore the Visual Timeline to see the sequence of events.
- Browse the Document Index to read the primary source evidence yourself.