Order on the motion for a preliminary injunction and the recommendation at Dkt. 7¶

Bass v. TTUHSC, No. 5:25-cv-00244-H-BV (N.D. Tex.) · Dkt. 18 · 2025-12-18 · PDF

Text extracted from the PDF; scanned pages were read by OCR. The PDF is the authoritative copy.

Case 5:25-cv-00244-H-BV

Document 18

Filed 12/18/25

Page 1 of 1

PageID 281

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION
KEVIN N. BASS,
Plaintiff,
v.

No. 5:25-CV-244-H

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
Before the Court is Kevin N. Bass’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 1
at 12. The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a
Recommendation (FCR) that the Court deny Bass’s motion for a preliminary injunction for
failing to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)’s notice requirement and for
failing to identify an irreparable harm.

See Dkt. No. 7. After the objection deadline expired,

Bass filed an objection to the FCR with attachments.

Dkt. Nos. 8; 11-13.

However, Bass has now filed an amended complaint that contains a new motion for

a preliminary injunction.

Dkt. No. 14 at 18. In light of the new motion, the Court denies

Bass’s original motion (Dkt. No. 1 at 12) as moot.
So ordered on December ! g

, 2025.

pe fre
JAMES
WESLEY HENDRIX
UNJTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE