ORDER granting 59 Motion for Extension of Time. Having considered the motion and procedural posture of this case, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. Pickett shall file¶

Pickett v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) et al, No. 5:20-cv-00232-H-BQ (N.D. Tex.) · Dkt. 60 · 2023-05-03 · PDF

Text extracted from the PDF; scanned pages were read by OCR. The PDF is the authoritative copy.

Case
6060 Filed
Page 1 of
PageID604
604
Case5:20-cv-00232-H-BV
5:20-cv-00232-H-BVDocument
Document
Filed05/03/23
05/03/23 Page
of 11 PageID

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION

AMY PICKETT,

§
§
Plaintiff,

§
§

v.

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-232-H-BQ

§
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH

SCIENCES CENTER (TTUHSC), et al.,

§

§
§

Defendants.

§
ORDER

Now before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Amy Pickett's unopposed motion for extension of
time to (1) respond to Defendants' discovery requests (interrogatories and requests for production),
and (2) file a response to Defendants' FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) motion. ECF No. 59; see ECF No. 58.

Pickett's discovery responses are apparently due May 3, while her response to Defendants' Rule
12(c) motion is required by May 5, 2023. Id. at 1·2. Pickett asks for an extension until May 15
to provide all responses because of an illness and "being under the care of a doctor." Id. The
certificate of conference attached to the motion indicates Defendants' do not oppose the relief

requested. Id. at 2.
Having considered the motion and procedural posture of this case, the Court hereby
GRANTS the motion. Pickett shall file her responses to Defendants' discovery requests and her

response to the Rule 12(c) motion no later than May 15, 2023.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2023.
D. GORDON BRYANT, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE