Skip to content

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND, RE: 38 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff shall file his responses to

Stewart v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center et al, No. 5:23-cv-00007-H (N.D. Tex.) · Dkt. 40 · 2023-09-25 · PDF

Text extracted from the PDF; scanned pages were read by OCR. The PDF is the authoritative copy.

Case
4040 Filed
Page 1 of
PageID318
318
Case5:23-cv-00007-H
5:23-cv-00007-HDocument
Document
Filed09/25/23
09/25/23 Page
of 11 PageID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

GEORGE STEWART,
Plaintiff,
No. 5:23-CV-007-H

v.

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH

SCIENCES CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

Before the Court is the plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to
Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and UT Defendants' Motion to Sever and Transfer. Dkt.

No. 38. The Court, finding good cause for an extension of the deadline, grants the motion.
It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff shall file his responses to the defendants' motions to
dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 33; 35) and the UT defendants' motion to sever and transfer (Dkt. No.
36) by October 17, 2023. Any response filed by October 17, 2023, shall be deemed timely.
The defendants shall then file their replies to the plaintiff's responses by October 31, 2023.

So ordered on September 25, 2023.

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Published Updated

Court filings and posts by Kevin Bass.