ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME: ORDER granting 23 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. It is therefore ordered that the defendants shall file a reply to the¶

Zapata Hincapie v. Texas Tech University et al, No. 5:23-cv-00045-H (N.D. Tex.) · Dkt. 24 · 2023-09-11 · PDF

Text extracted from the PDF; scanned pages were read by OCR. The PDF is the authoritative copy.

Case 5:23-cv-00045-H

Document 24

Filed 09/11/23

Page 1 of 1

PageID 381

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION
JOHN ALEXANDER ZAPATA
HINCAPIE,
Plaintiff,

No. 5:23-CV-045-H
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, et ai.,
Defendants.

ORDERGRANTING EXTENSION O FTIME
Before the Court is the defendants' unopposed motion for an extension of time to file
their reply in support of their motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 23. The Court, finding good
cause for an extension ofthe deadline, grants the motion. It is therefore ordered that the

defendants shal1 flle a reply to the plaintiffs response to their motion by September 28,

2023. Any reply filed by September 28,2023, shall be deemed timely.
So ordered on September

/l , 2023.
J

WESLEY HENDRIX
D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE