MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 19 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by John Alexander Zapata Hincapie (Attachments: # 1 Proposed¶
Zapata Hincapie v. Texas Tech University et al, No. 5:23-cv-00045-H (N.D. Tex.) · Dkt. 20 · 2023-08-17 · PDF
Text extracted from the PDF; scanned pages were read by OCR. The PDF is the authoritative copy.
Case 5:23-cv-00045-H Document 20 Filed 08/17/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 342 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION JOHN ALEXANDER ZAPATA HINCAPIE, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, Dr. Sindee Lou Simon, Dr. Albert Sacco, Jr., Dr. Mark A. Sheridan, Dr. Brandon Weeks, Dr. Gerardine Gabriela Botte, Dr. Chau-Chyun Chen, Dr. Siva Vanapalli,1) Dr. Wei Li, Dr. Harvinder Singh Gill, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-00045 JURY DEMANDED PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff John Alexander Zapata Hincapie hereby files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and would respectfully show the Court as follows: (1) On June 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 11). (2) On July 31, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 19). (3) Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is currently due on August 21, 2023. 1 Case 5:23-cv-00045-H (4) Document 20 Filed 08/17/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 343 The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff is preparing for an administrative trial that will take up most of the week of August 21, 2023, and has a wide variety of other pressing work obligations as well. (5) Given the number of issues and parties involved and the work schedule of his counsel, Plaintiff respectfully requests a brief ten-day extension until August 31, 2023, to file his response to the motion to dismiss. (6) Plaintiff’s counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendants concerning the relief requested in this Motion, and counsel for Defendants indicated that he is unopposed to that relief. (7) Neither party will suffer prejudice from this brief extension of time. (8) The relief requested in this unopposed motion is not sought for purposes of delay, but only so that justice may be done. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion thereby extending the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ motion to dismiss until August 31, 2023. DATED: August 17, 2023 Respectfully submitted, __/s/ Mark Whitburn______ Mark Whitburn Texas Bar No. 24042144 Whitburn & Pevsner, PLLC 2000 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 600 Arlington, Texas 76006 Tel: (817) 653-4547 Fax: (817) 653-4477 mwhitburn@whitburnpevsner.com 2 Case 5:23-cv-00045-H Document 20 Filed 08/17/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 344 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that I conferred with counsel of record for Defendants, Jason T. Contreras, by electronic mail on August 17, 2023, regarding the relief requested in the foregoing Motion and that Mr. Contreras indicated that the requested relief was unopposed. __/s/ Mark Whitburn______ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing document was served on counsel of record for Defendants on August 21, 2023, through the electronic filing service as follows: Jason T. Contreras Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General General Litigation Division P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 __/s/ Mark Whitburn______ 3